Since, the Republicans have completed two terms (8 yrs) in the oval office, I thought to compare their policy impact on Pakistan’s economy and compare it with previous eight years of Democrats Clinton era. In addition, I also compared the South Asian region’s economy to see how it grew under both. Holding everything constant (ceteris paribus), I took Gross Domestic Product (GDP) growth rate as a core economic indicator to describe country’s economical health. There are other macro-economic indicators as well which are equally important in analyzing the economy, but, to avoid complexity, I kept it simple with just one variable. Note that I’m not favoring any political party nor seeking any association. Instead, this analysis is done purely on factual basis. In addition, it’s not necessary to judge the performance of any political party based on its foreign policy or on any other country’s performance. However, it’s one of the several factors which demand careful consideration in describing successes and failures.
Pakistan’s GDP Growth under Democrats era (1993-2000):
Pakistan’s GDP Growth under Democrats era (1993-2000):

Pakistan’s GDP Growth under Republicans era (2001-2008):
South Asian region average growth under Democrats (1993-2000):
South Asian region average growth under Republicans (2001-2008):
The above data is taken from various resources such as World Bank, CIA world fact book, Asian Development Bank, IAEA, State Bank of Pakistan and etc. To make the argument interesting, let’s look at World’s GDP under both; republicans and democrats:
World’s GDP under Democrats (1993-2000):
World’s GDP under Republicans (2001-2008):
I’ll not allow myself to be the advocate of any party rather would welcome others comment to come up with better reasoning in supporting their association. In conclusion, be it Democrats or Republicans, every decision made by America has an impact on other countries. Every political move by these parties changes the economic cycle of other regions. Let’s hope the newly elected President Obama proves good for the developing economies.


